Marker Griffon X 13 vs Look Pivot 2.0 13 GW: Which Ski Binding Fits Your Setup?

Compare the 2027 Griffon X 13 and Pivot 2.0 13 GW on release ranges, adjustment, sole compatibility and US prices, with shop fitting advice.

SkiTrader may earn a commission from shop links; it never changes the order of prices.

Pick the Marker Griffon X 13 if a qualified shop confirms it suits your boots and release setting, and you want the lower-priced option in this pair. Pick the Look Pivot 2.0 13 GW if you prefer the Pivot system and plan to keep the boots used for mounting. Both are unisex bindings aimed at advanced and expert skiers, with the Marker offering a lower minimum release value and more stated adjustment.

We haven't tried these two for this comparison.

The specs side by side

The Marker Griffon X 13 and Look Pivot 2.0 13 GW were in stock at US shops on 5 Nov 2026; the prices below are in USD.

Similar upper limits, different lower limits

The Griffon has a release range of 4–13, while the Pivot's range is 4.5–13. Have a qualified technician choose the setting for your skier information and actual boot sole length. If the appropriate setting falls below the Pivot's minimum but within the Griffon's range, the Marker is the relevant candidate.

The lower limit deserves particular attention for a lighter skier. Share your height, weight, age and skiing style with the technician, along with the boots you will use. Choose the binding whose operating range suits the resulting setting, even if you ski demanding terrain confidently.

Take either binding to a qualified ski shop for mounting, release settings and release testing. Bring the actual skis and boots so the technician can check the complete combination. Return for another adjustment and release check when you change boots, even if the new pair seems to click into the binding normally.

Adjustment deserves attention before mounting

The Griffon's heel adjustment is 20 mm, while the Pivot's length adjustment is 12 mm. More adjustment is useful if a future boot change is likely, so the Marker is the practical starting point for that situation. Discuss the installed position with the technician before mounting so the available movement suits your plans.

If you expect to replace boots soon, bring that up while discussing the Griffon or Pivot. A new boot can have a different sole length even when its stated size is similar. The shop needs the actual sole length and the binding's installed position to determine what adjustment remains.

With the Pivot, settle your boot choice before mounting whenever possible. Its smaller adjustment range makes that particularly useful. For either binding, a new boot beyond the available travel may require a remount, so include that possibility in the cost of changing your setup.

Sole compatibility before system preference

Both bindings accept alpine and GripWalk soles, making them suitable candidates for many resort setups. Have the shop inspect your sole type and condition before mounting. If you use touring boots, the technician should check the exact sole against the binding's requirements as part of that compatibility assessment.

Marker uses an Inter Pivot X heel and Triple Pivot Elite X toe. Look uses a Pivot 2.0 heel and Full Action toe. If you already prefer the Pivot's entry and exit routine, that familiarity can justify choosing it again. If you have no system preference, the Griffon's lower starting price makes it the straightforward value choice.

Brake fit also needs to match your ski and the actual binding variant. Do not buy whichever price is lowest before confirming the appropriate brake option with the installer.

Which should you buy

Choose the Griffon X 13 when it meets the shop's requirements and cost or its stated adjustment is the deciding factor. Choose the Pivot 2.0 13 GW when you want that system and your boots, ski and required release setting fit it.

Compare the Griffon X 13 and Pivot 2.0 13 GW, then read how to choose ski bindings and GripWalk versus alpine soles before the shop visit.